Social Media Monetization is becoming THE hot issue in online community chatter. Probably because companies are getting past the “why should we care?” and into “how do we get some dosh?” questions.

Social Ads are driving down the price of regular online ads:

A recent analysis by ComScore shows social networks, primarily Facebook and MySpace, have over the last year drawn an average CPM of only 56 cents, compared to the $2.43 average for the internet at large. Looking more closely, the ComScore data show that the average pricing for online ads exclusive of social-networking sites, namely Facebook and MySpace, would be much higher, about $2.99 for every 1,000 views; social sites dragged down the average online CPM by as much as 18% over the last year.

comscore

Some industry executives are concerned that Facebook and its ilk may in fact be reducing the overall pricing of CPMs, or the cost-per-thousand impressions, that are the basis for online ad pricing. (read the rest on AdAge)

The challenge is not that Facebook and other social networking sites are underpricing advertising, it’s that the context is different in online communities. And don’t think normal context – matching ads with subject keywords. Think emotional context.

If you wanted to advertise a new baby pram, you wouldn’t necessarily choose a TV show about cars or a magazine about trucks to do it, would you? And so it is online, we are used to matching ads with audience demographics. Even psychographics, thinking laterally. But what about mood? Focus and attention? At least with TV and magazines you know that at least nominally, they are there with some focus.

How do you advertise to an audience that is busy doing something contextually irrelevant to your keywords?

Situational advertising during social discussions by clintjcl on Flickr

Situational advertising during social discussions by clintjcl on Flickr

You know what I mean: have you ever been running – nay, flying – from one meeting to another and had one of those guys on the street hold out a hand and stop you with “Do you have a few  minutes to save the planet”? No mate, I don’t – can’t you see I’m sprinting here, running late?

They make you feel so guilty. But there’s a time and place for those sorts of things and about to get the sack for running late yet again is not one of those times.

I think we accepted interruptive advertising on TV – nicely snuggled down to watch Sound of Music (or in my case, Chuck) and the ads come in. We get up, get a drink and do other things. Then back when the ads are finished. We’ve been trained to be passive, mildly receptive and basically quiet and doing as we’re told.

I talk through movies and TV shows a lot and am always in trouble in our house. Are you surprised?

In online communities, we are busy, like we are rushing from one meeting to another. And it’s personal – unlike watching a movie, which only occasionally engages our heart and soul. We are chatting with friends. We don’t want to get up mid conversation and click on an ad. We’re in the middle of our own soap opera.

If you ever wonder why advertising is the lowest revenue when monetizating for social networking it’s this: we are in active mode, not passive. We are in creative mode, not receiving. Chances are we won’t even notice the ads, while we fight with our boyfriend, gossip with our mum and dig around for jobs.

Unless it’s relevant to the discussion. Or we can get a kiss.

Bookmark This:
  • email
  • Add to favorites
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • del.icio.us
  • LinkedIn
  • StumbleUpon
  • Technorati
  • Digg
  • Live
  • Google Bookmarks
  • NewsVine
  • Tumblr
  • Reddit
  • MySpace
  • Slashdot
  • Netvibes

You back again? o.O Oh well, you may want to subscribe to my RSS feed, follow me on Twitter SilkCharm or get these blog posts in email when you want Good to see you again, feel free to leave a nice comment on a Featured Post :) !

Technorati Tags: , , , , , , , ,

Related posts