29 Comments

  1. Is it fair to condense newspapers, TV, and film –film?– into the same category?

    Newspapers are reacting to advertisers going online, TV is providing online alternatives, e.g. Hulu, and film is a completely different medium.

    Ari Herzog’s last blog post..Twitter and Me

    1. *puzzled* yes of course, they are all mediums and the medium is changing. While this piece is primarily about Newspapers, my line about film and TV actually says By heritage media, I mean those newspapers, TV, film, radio etc that are refusing to implement social strategies to leverage a global shift in creation, distribution and consumption of media. Not Hulu, but heritage TV (with no online component).

      Here’s my post on the The Future of Cinema. Film is no longer consumed at the box office. Digital Hollywood was yesterday – no doubt dealing with the massive impact online communities, ARGs, social media campaigns, virtual worlds, machinima and so on are making to the traditional film industry.

      I run courses at the Australian Film Television and Radio School on how movies cannot remain isolated from the audience. No content can, anymore. Think of Dark Knight and it’s social media campaign – highest grossing film of last year!

  2. Though, it’s worth being conscious that radio is consumed differently than other media, and is generally regarded as more personal and intimate in the first place.

    That having been said, there is a shift in the way that people interact with radio, and perhapps (broadly) this is accepted a little more readily.

    All in all, everyone is changing the way they consume in every medium, and eveyone has to adjust, and that does also include those already publishing online.

    1. Love the last line. the podcast is dead as far as I am concerned – live citizen radio ala blogtalkradio where callers can call in then pushed out as closed finished podcasts are the new model.
      A bit like the current YouTube is dying and not just because of it’s copyright issues. It’s non peer to peer, locked down finished content, not downloadable or editable (though that is also evolving).

      thanks for the paper – will devour on the weekend 🙂

  3. Pingback: Typeboard
    1. yeah that’s a similar one to the original (2004?) EPIC 2014 vision from the “Museum of Media History”.

      Coined the word “Googlezon”. 😛

  4. I agree, maybe the newspapers will go down (concerning sales), but newspapers will stand on their feet for those who like to read on paper.
    No matter what kind of support (notebooks, ebooks, or any other electronic format) people will use for newspapers, i am hundred percent sure that readers wil not give up to the classical newspapers.

    No worrys 😉

    mariushim’s last blog post..Operatiunea Monstru – Bicicleta galbena

    1. yeah I heard that from the Typewriter salesman. And I’m pretty sure the horse and buggy guys said “we’ve been around for hundreds of years, we’ll continue to survive.” 😛

      The iPod generation will look at paper, the environment, their iPhone and vote it down. Unfortunately, cos I too like the smell and feel of newspaper.

      The fact that physical newspapers will no longer be able to bear the cost of their own weight is without dispute, surely? It’s more the shape and form the online version will take, perhaps? Though I did hear of perhaps governments subsidizing physical paper newspapers. Dont’ see it myself though… where is autonomy in a gov funded newspaper? Though I guess public broadcasting does well enough.

  5. I’m not sure we will lose newspapers altogether, but there is a definite shift needed. As mentioned the cycle is there and I feel many are just stuck in the denial stage. The thing is users dictate what will be by buying newspapers etc so if the papers lose touch with the upcoming generation then their sales will reflect it. If more people are advertising online or finding other medium more effective, then newspapers have to get with the program. No good being in denial, angry or anything else. How they do that is the question.
    .-= seo´s last blog ..What is the Future of PageRank? =-.

  6. I’m not sure we will lose newspapers altogether, but there is a definite shift needed. As mentioned the cycle is there and I feel many are just stuck in the denial stage. The thing is users dictate what will be by buying newspapers etc so if the papers lose touch with the upcoming generation then their sales will reflect it. If more people are advertising online or finding other medium more effective, then newspapers have to get with the program. No good being in denial, angry or anything else. How they do that is the question.

  7. It is clear that electronic information is the future as it speeds up the process from start to finish and the time and cost required by the consumer to access the information. Unfortunately the sad part is that very experienced people who have built careers in Journalism seem to be loosing their jobs… They hopefully will find a way to use their skills effectively in another Industry.

Comments are closed.