1. Thanks for the mention of our @BigPondTeam and our customer care efforts in Twitter. The feedback from you and others in the Twitter community is helping shape our Web 2.0 customer access channels and the way we support BigPond customers. The level of collaboration continues to be high and v.resfreshing. Our approach will continue to develop and evolve as more Australians use Twitter and as we consider extending our capability across other Telstra products and services. We have more to do and if anyone would like to share their thoughts or ideas please look us up http://twitter.com/bigpondteam or DM @BradyJacobsen.

  2. Hi Laurel,
    What’s your view on self regulation vs imposed or structural regulations within peer to peer economies? This is the bit that has me befuddled.

  3. @BJ goody 🙂 Feel free to organise for Telstra to offer a Twitter SMS service. We are one of the few countries in the world where Twitter cancelled the SMS – more Australians would use the service then, as a mobile community.

    @Kate, I gave a presentation a year or year and half ago at a Dept of Regulatory Affairs conference. Basically saying that the community will undertake regulatory affairs themselves. E.g. Whirlpool.net makes deliberately confusing broadband contracts simple, and names and shames those companies not playing right. Ditto Parent’s Jury community (advertising to kids) and so on. The regulatory affairs position in organisations and government will be rolled into PR and probably become the “Customer Community Affairs Relations” or similar.

    In other words, the community will allow it’s leaders (natural, from within) to stipulate what is acceptable and what is not.

    The phone/email carpet bombing (mass activity or flash mobbing) planned for Stephen Conroy’s office next week may show if Australia is ready for mass, grassroots accepting of responsibility to make their voice heard and to tackle issues of industry regulations. We’ll see…

  4. Thanks Laurel.

    I think what’s interesting is the norms that exist in different communities and whether these constitute acceptable vs non acceptable behaviour in the broader community or within other groups.

    So for example, irresponsible lending practices in the US have been deemed acceptable within the financial community for a period, and this has contributed significantly to the current crisis. Obviously, this has now been deemed unacceptable, but not before it caused huge problems for everyone.

    So do you think this kind of unchecked behaviour will become more difficult to engage as companies are forced to embrace greater transparency? What happens when standards within certain communities are out of step with the broader community but not subject to more structural regulation?

Comments are closed.