<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: 2web and the Digital Gender Divide</title>
	<atom:link href="http://laurelpapworth.com/2web-and-digital-gender-divide/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://laurelpapworth.com/2web-and-digital-gender-divide/</link>
	<description>The Business of Social Media, Online Communities &#38; Social Networks</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 12 Mar 2010 00:03:33 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Laurel Papworth</title>
		<link>http://laurelpapworth.com/2web-and-digital-gender-divide/comment-page-1/#comment-1338</link>
		<dc:creator>Laurel Papworth</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 May 2008 18:15:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://laurelpapworth.com/2web-and-the-digital-gender-divide/#comment-1338</guid>
		<description>Here it is &lt;a HREF=&quot;http://2webcrew.thepodcastnetwork.com/&quot; REL=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;The podcast network 2webcrew&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br/&gt;I haven&#039;t been on a for a few weeks - travelling - but might be able to make it this Wednesday. yay! &lt;br/&gt;Jason Calacanis was on last week... go have a listen :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Here it is <a HREF="http://2webcrew.thepodcastnetwork.com/" REL="nofollow">The podcast network 2webcrew</a><br />I haven&#8217;t been on a for a few weeks &#8211; travelling &#8211; but might be able to make it this Wednesday. yay! <br />Jason Calacanis was on last week&#8230; go have a listen <img src='http://laurelpapworth.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Benn</title>
		<link>http://laurelpapworth.com/2web-and-digital-gender-divide/comment-page-1/#comment-1336</link>
		<dc:creator>Benn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 May 2008 13:37:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://laurelpapworth.com/2web-and-the-digital-gender-divide/#comment-1336</guid>
		<description>Well I can&#039;t even get on to the 2web site tonight. Keeps timing out. For that fact, I&#039;ve never seen it, heard of it....&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;Go figure.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well I can&#8217;t even get on to the 2web site tonight. Keeps timing out. For that fact, I&#8217;ve never seen it, heard of it&#8230;.</p>
<p>Go figure.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Laurel Papworth</title>
		<link>http://laurelpapworth.com/2web-and-digital-gender-divide/comment-page-1/#comment-425</link>
		<dc:creator>Laurel Papworth</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Aug 2007 21:40:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://laurelpapworth.com/2web-and-the-digital-gender-divide/#comment-425</guid>
		<description>*hurriedly pulls back down her skirts* yeah yeah we&#039;re ummm &lt;i&gt;feisty&lt;/i&gt;. :P&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;@Richard, I don&#039;t know you hon, but you are saying the right things. You can come out of the doghouse now. :)&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;@Bronwen Cait&#039;s right don&#039;t hold your breath.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;@Cait, asshat pigs are &lt;i&gt;actively sexist&lt;/i&gt;, nice guys do it &lt;i&gt;passively&lt;/i&gt;, by accident. They ARE nice guys - albeit of the burpin&#039; fartin&#039; ball scratchin&#039; variety - and yep, nothing is intentional.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;I would like to point out that glass ceilings (and walls) are glass for the very reason that people don&#039;t see them. Not even the guys who are building &#039;em. Me, I&#039;m clumsy, normally I just crash right through. :)&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;Hmmm, our lads have been tortured enough (for one day). Out ya come, from the doghouse. Except Ben, he seems quite at home there, I think he&#039;s ordered in pizza. :)&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;So. over it, nothing to see here folks, time to move on - Meg&#039;s put up the &lt;a HREF=&quot;http://blogpond.com.au/top-100-australian-blogs-index/&quot; REL=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Top100 blogs&lt;/a&gt; for this week. Emily&#039;s got a &lt;a HREF=&quot;http://www.conformistsunite.com/?p=436&quot; REL=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;great post&lt;/a&gt; on a charity -book  by bloggers, &lt;a HREF=&quot;http://www.solidariti.com/article/MyAbodo&quot; REL=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Priscilla&lt;/a&gt; is talking up widgets in the not for profit sector, and the list goes on. I&#039;m sure the guys have done something important too. Heh.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>*hurriedly pulls back down her skirts* yeah yeah we&#8217;re ummm <i>feisty</i>. <img src='http://laurelpapworth.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_razz.gif' alt=':P' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>@Richard, I don&#8217;t know you hon, but you are saying the right things. You can come out of the doghouse now. <img src='http://laurelpapworth.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>@Bronwen Cait&#8217;s right don&#8217;t hold your breath.</p>
<p>@Cait, asshat pigs are <i>actively sexist</i>, nice guys do it <i>passively</i>, by accident. They ARE nice guys &#8211; albeit of the burpin&#8217; fartin&#8217; ball scratchin&#8217; variety &#8211; and yep, nothing is intentional.</p>
<p>I would like to point out that glass ceilings (and walls) are glass for the very reason that people don&#8217;t see them. Not even the guys who are building &#8216;em. Me, I&#8217;m clumsy, normally I just crash right through. <img src='http://laurelpapworth.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>Hmmm, our lads have been tortured enough (for one day). Out ya come, from the doghouse. Except Ben, he seems quite at home there, I think he&#8217;s ordered in pizza. <img src='http://laurelpapworth.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>So. over it, nothing to see here folks, time to move on &#8211; Meg&#8217;s put up the <a HREF="http://blogpond.com.au/top-100-australian-blogs-index/" REL="nofollow">Top100 blogs</a> for this week. Emily&#8217;s got a <a HREF="http://www.conformistsunite.com/?p=436" REL="nofollow">great post</a> on a charity -book  by bloggers, <a HREF="http://www.solidariti.com/article/MyAbodo" REL="nofollow">Priscilla</a> is talking up widgets in the not for profit sector, and the list goes on. I&#8217;m sure the guys have done something important too. Heh.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cait</title>
		<link>http://laurelpapworth.com/2web-and-digital-gender-divide/comment-page-1/#comment-423</link>
		<dc:creator>Cait</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Aug 2007 14:18:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://laurelpapworth.com/2web-and-the-digital-gender-divide/#comment-423</guid>
		<description>I remember this discussion from when it started (well over a year ago) and it&#039;s just beating a dead horse.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;Knowing five of the eight members of 2web, they&#039;re not excluding kind of guys.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;Don&#039;t wait to be invited to a group, get involved.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;The landscape has changed a lot since 2web was formed, as you can see by the missing blogs on the 2web page.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;2web is not a secret men-only organisation, it&#039;s just a web page created by a group of friends.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I remember this discussion from when it started (well over a year ago) and it&#8217;s just beating a dead horse.</p>
<p>Knowing five of the eight members of 2web, they&#8217;re not excluding kind of guys.</p>
<p>Don&#8217;t wait to be invited to a group, get involved.</p>
<p>The landscape has changed a lot since 2web was formed, as you can see by the missing blogs on the 2web page.</p>
<p>2web is not a secret men-only organisation, it&#8217;s just a web page created by a group of friends.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bronwen</title>
		<link>http://laurelpapworth.com/2web-and-digital-gender-divide/comment-page-1/#comment-422</link>
		<dc:creator>Bronwen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Aug 2007 12:10:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://laurelpapworth.com/2web-and-the-digital-gender-divide/#comment-422</guid>
		<description>Hi Laurel,&lt;br/&gt;This is a hard one. I&#039;ve wondered like you about the exclusion of females in this group, but having met a few of the MEN I consider some of them good friends  and I&#039;d say their exclusion comes from lack of time as well as organisation.&lt;br/&gt;I still don&#039;t think that&#039;s entirely good enough though! We&#039;re all in the same boat, making the same personal sacrifices and it doesn&#039;t take a great deal of effort to include some females among the 2web crew..&lt;br/&gt;I know my name was put forward a few months ago, and I&#039;ve not yet been invited. When I&#039;ve asked I&#039;m told the invitation is coming.&lt;br/&gt;Perhaps there are other reasons for my exclusion - I&#039;d like to think not sexist - but I&#039;d really love to know what they are. &lt;br/&gt;Launching a start-up is no walk in the park so I think a bit of solidarity here would go a long way.&lt;br/&gt;On that note Cam I think you&#039;re out of line and I&#039;d love to know what you mean by &quot;passive&quot;? Are we not playing as hard as you? Happy to take it up with you and Rich on G&#039;day world - if I&#039;m worthy ;)&lt;br/&gt;Thanks Laurel for bringing this up - I think it&#039;s about time we had a good discussion about this - obviously more than a few of us have wondered about it quietly.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Laurel,<br />This is a hard one. I&#8217;ve wondered like you about the exclusion of females in this group, but having met a few of the MEN I consider some of them good friends  and I&#8217;d say their exclusion comes from lack of time as well as organisation.<br />I still don&#8217;t think that&#8217;s entirely good enough though! We&#8217;re all in the same boat, making the same personal sacrifices and it doesn&#8217;t take a great deal of effort to include some females among the 2web crew..<br />I know my name was put forward a few months ago, and I&#8217;ve not yet been invited. When I&#8217;ve asked I&#8217;m told the invitation is coming.<br />Perhaps there are other reasons for my exclusion &#8211; I&#8217;d like to think not sexist &#8211; but I&#8217;d really love to know what they are. <br />Launching a start-up is no walk in the park so I think a bit of solidarity here would go a long way.<br />On that note Cam I think you&#8217;re out of line and I&#8217;d love to know what you mean by &#8220;passive&#8221;? Are we not playing as hard as you? Happy to take it up with you and Rich on G&#8217;day world &#8211; if I&#8217;m worthy <img src='http://laurelpapworth.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' /> <br />Thanks Laurel for bringing this up &#8211; I think it&#8217;s about time we had a good discussion about this &#8211; obviously more than a few of us have wondered about it quietly.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Richard Giles</title>
		<link>http://laurelpapworth.com/2web-and-digital-gender-divide/comment-page-1/#comment-421</link>
		<dc:creator>Richard Giles</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Aug 2007 11:04:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://laurelpapworth.com/2web-and-the-digital-gender-divide/#comment-421</guid>
		<description>Hi Laurel.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;Great that you&#039;ve opened the conversation.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;There is definitely no sexism involved that I&#039;m aware of. In fact we&#039;ve discussed adding some females recently. The only reason that I&#039;m aware of there has not been anyone added or announced is that we&#039;re all flat out busy. As has been pointed out, the blog is a little out of date, and even the mailing list is broken.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;But, again, great that you&#039;ve inspired the conversation.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;Rich</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Laurel.</p>
<p>Great that you&#8217;ve opened the conversation.</p>
<p>There is definitely no sexism involved that I&#8217;m aware of. In fact we&#8217;ve discussed adding some females recently. The only reason that I&#8217;m aware of there has not been anyone added or announced is that we&#8217;re all flat out busy. As has been pointed out, the blog is a little out of date, and even the mailing list is broken.</p>
<p>But, again, great that you&#8217;ve inspired the conversation.</p>
<p>Rich</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cat's Experiment</title>
		<link>http://laurelpapworth.com/2web-and-digital-gender-divide/comment-page-1/#comment-420</link>
		<dc:creator>Cat's Experiment</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Aug 2007 09:27:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://laurelpapworth.com/2web-and-the-digital-gender-divide/#comment-420</guid>
		<description>three cheers &amp; a swig of champagne to Laurel! &lt;br/&gt;I&#039;ve been far too busy today dealing with hacked in ebay accounts &amp; tech support who ASSUME I don&#039;t know anything cos I&#039;m a chick..well..do I need to recite my resume? &lt;br/&gt;enough of that.. the web needs women like a man needs? a bra?&lt;br/&gt;The semantics of this situation are interesting..men are evangelists &amp; women share. &lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;There is no need to gang up..there&#039;s plenty to share...just watch out, &#039;cos according to new reports there are more women on-line than men..</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>three cheers &#038; a swig of champagne to Laurel! <br />I&#8217;ve been far too busy today dealing with hacked in ebay accounts &#038; tech support who ASSUME I don&#8217;t know anything cos I&#8217;m a chick..well..do I need to recite my resume? <br />enough of that.. the web needs women like a man needs? a bra?<br />The semantics of this situation are interesting..men are evangelists &#038; women share. </p>
<p>There is no need to gang up..there&#8217;s plenty to share&#8230;just watch out, &#8216;cos according to new reports there are more women on-line than men..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cheryl</title>
		<link>http://laurelpapworth.com/2web-and-digital-gender-divide/comment-page-1/#comment-419</link>
		<dc:creator>Cheryl</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Aug 2007 07:36:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://laurelpapworth.com/2web-and-the-digital-gender-divide/#comment-419</guid>
		<description>&quot;oh please let us come and play with you boys, please. We promise we won&#039;t whine or be so passive in future, in fact I&#039;ll ensure that I&#039;ll hike up my skirt and act like &quot;one of the boys&quot;.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;Bah. &lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;Seen this argument go round for years and years. It used to really piss me off and make me outraged, now I think fuck em, let them have their boys club and always wonder why there are no girls around.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;oh please let us come and play with you boys, please. We promise we won&#8217;t whine or be so passive in future, in fact I&#8217;ll ensure that I&#8217;ll hike up my skirt and act like &#8220;one of the boys&#8221;.</p>
<p>Bah. </p>
<p>Seen this argument go round for years and years. It used to really piss me off and make me outraged, now I think fuck em, let them have their boys club and always wonder why there are no girls around.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stephen Collins</title>
		<link>http://laurelpapworth.com/2web-and-digital-gender-divide/comment-page-1/#comment-418</link>
		<dc:creator>Stephen Collins</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Aug 2007 04:18:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://laurelpapworth.com/2web-and-the-digital-gender-divide/#comment-418</guid>
		<description>Laurel, Cameron&#039;s comments suggest he doesn&#039;t quite get where you&#039;re coming from - they even sound more than a little misogynist (which bothers me).  &lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;2web have always looked a bit like a boys&#039; club to me but I&#039;ve never thought it was intentional, rather just missing bits.  It&#039;s also very static - as other commenters have noted.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;Go for it, as you&#039;ve all got more than enough smart things to say!&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;Can boys like me be in your club too? ;)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Laurel, Cameron&#8217;s comments suggest he doesn&#8217;t quite get where you&#8217;re coming from &#8211; they even sound more than a little misogynist (which bothers me).  </p>
<p>2web have always looked a bit like a boys&#8217; club to me but I&#8217;ve never thought it was intentional, rather just missing bits.  It&#8217;s also very static &#8211; as other commenters have noted.</p>
<p>Go for it, as you&#8217;ve all got more than enough smart things to say!</p>
<p>Can boys like me be in your club too? <img src='http://laurelpapworth.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: priscilla</title>
		<link>http://laurelpapworth.com/2web-and-digital-gender-divide/comment-page-1/#comment-417</link>
		<dc:creator>priscilla</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Aug 2007 02:51:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://laurelpapworth.com/2web-and-the-digital-gender-divide/#comment-417</guid>
		<description>@Cameron:&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;&quot;If there is passive sexism involved here, it&#039;s you girls being too passive about getting involved!&quot;&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;... Interesting. Passive is not a word that people usually use to describe us (well, me and Laurel at the very least). &quot;Feisty&quot; is probably closer to the mark :-P&lt;br/&gt;If people don&#039;t know *at least* one Web20 Aussie woman blogger by now, then they must be living in some little clique bubble, because there&#039;s lots of us out there!&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;&quot;Hike up your skirts girls!&quot;&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;... err, no thank you.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Cameron:</p>
<p>&#8220;If there is passive sexism involved here, it&#8217;s you girls being too passive about getting involved!&#8221;</p>
<p>&#8230; Interesting. Passive is not a word that people usually use to describe us (well, me and Laurel at the very least). &#8220;Feisty&#8221; is probably closer to the mark <img src='http://laurelpapworth.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_razz.gif' alt=':-P' class='wp-smiley' /> <br />If people don&#8217;t know *at least* one Web20 Aussie woman blogger by now, then they must be living in some little clique bubble, because there&#8217;s lots of us out there!</p>
<p>&#8220;Hike up your skirts girls!&#8221;</p>
<p>&#8230; err, no thank you.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Laurel Papworth</title>
		<link>http://laurelpapworth.com/2web-and-digital-gender-divide/comment-page-1/#comment-416</link>
		<dc:creator>Laurel Papworth</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Aug 2007 01:16:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://laurelpapworth.com/2web-and-the-digital-gender-divide/#comment-416</guid>
		<description>@cameron - hon, there is no membership thingie. Just a contact us at the bottom. BTW the page looks broken in FFX  - codey bits showing. And oh we&#039;ll join, after we finish our &lt;a HREF=&quot;http://www.passiveaggressivenotes.com/&quot; REL=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;passiveaggressive&lt;/a&gt; griping :P &lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;@scott - I asked in a comment on Ben Barren&#039;s blog why he has pictures of lindsay lohan and girlies with boobies, but I figured it out. It&#039;s cos he&#039;s so bloody hard to follow, at least you have something to look at ... &lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;@molly - i remember you from the SmartyHost awards thing a few years ago *laughs* and thanks for the backhanded compliment. Grrrrr.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@cameron &#8211; hon, there is no membership thingie. Just a contact us at the bottom. BTW the page looks broken in FFX  &#8211; codey bits showing. And oh we&#8217;ll join, after we finish our <a HREF="http://www.passiveaggressivenotes.com/" REL="nofollow">passiveaggressive</a> griping <img src='http://laurelpapworth.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_razz.gif' alt=':P' class='wp-smiley' />  </p>
<p>@scott &#8211; I asked in a comment on Ben Barren&#8217;s blog why he has pictures of lindsay lohan and girlies with boobies, but I figured it out. It&#8217;s cos he&#8217;s so bloody hard to follow, at least you have something to look at &#8230; </p>
<p>@molly &#8211; i remember you from the SmartyHost awards thing a few years ago *laughs* and thanks for the backhanded compliment. Grrrrr.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Phillip Molly Malone</title>
		<link>http://laurelpapworth.com/2web-and-digital-gender-divide/comment-page-1/#comment-415</link>
		<dc:creator>Phillip Molly Malone</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Aug 2007 01:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://laurelpapworth.com/2web-and-the-digital-gender-divide/#comment-415</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t think you qualify. See your probably more driven and are able to follow through a project to the end. These guys can&#039;t even keep one page updated. Lets not even talk about the podcast they started (&lt;a&gt;http://2webcrew.thepodcastnetwork.com/&lt;/a&gt; (just celebrating a year of doing nothing in the last month! Maybe the girls could get this puppy off the ground again and show the guys how to do it!!!!).&lt;br/&gt;Your better off staying away from them.&lt;br/&gt;Molly&lt;br/&gt;PS. Good link baiting effort though.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t think you qualify. See your probably more driven and are able to follow through a project to the end. These guys can&#8217;t even keep one page updated. Lets not even talk about the podcast they started (<a>http://2webcrew.thepodcastnetwork.com/</a> (just celebrating a year of doing nothing in the last month! Maybe the girls could get this puppy off the ground again and show the guys how to do it!!!!).<br />Your better off staying away from them.<br />Molly<br />PS. Good link baiting effort though.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Scott Handsaker</title>
		<link>http://laurelpapworth.com/2web-and-digital-gender-divide/comment-page-1/#comment-414</link>
		<dc:creator>Scott Handsaker</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Aug 2007 00:44:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://laurelpapworth.com/2web-and-the-digital-gender-divide/#comment-414</guid>
		<description>My current feeds include Priscilla, Nik and Cameron Reilly.  &lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;Nik is solid (if a little infrequent).  Priscilla is good, especially now she has comments switched on!&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;Cam Reilly is so diverse and frequent that it is a regular read (even if I have never listened to any of the podcasts).&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;Ben Barren - try reading his blog for a month (I did), and see if you can make any sense out of any of it.  Brain dump style of writing that doesn&#039;t cut through for me (everyone to their own I guess).&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;I&#039;m always up for adding a new feed though, so will def check out   Megalicious, Katie, Cat, Emily, Chezza and Bronwen Clune. &lt;br/&gt;  &lt;br/&gt;RSS has taken over email as my new form of procrastination... :-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My current feeds include Priscilla, Nik and Cameron Reilly.  </p>
<p>Nik is solid (if a little infrequent).  Priscilla is good, especially now she has comments switched on!</p>
<p>Cam Reilly is so diverse and frequent that it is a regular read (even if I have never listened to any of the podcasts).</p>
<p>Ben Barren &#8211; try reading his blog for a month (I did), and see if you can make any sense out of any of it.  Brain dump style of writing that doesn&#8217;t cut through for me (everyone to their own I guess).</p>
<p>I&#8217;m always up for adding a new feed though, so will def check out   Megalicious, Katie, Cat, Emily, Chezza and Bronwen Clune. </p>
<p>RSS has taken over email as my new form of procrastination&#8230; <img src='http://laurelpapworth.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: cameronreilly</title>
		<link>http://laurelpapworth.com/2web-and-digital-gender-divide/comment-page-1/#comment-413</link>
		<dc:creator>cameronreilly</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Aug 2007 00:19:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://laurelpapworth.com/2web-and-the-digital-gender-divide/#comment-413</guid>
		<description>Hey I, for one, am a HUGE supporter of the meme that we need more women in tech/web. Lots and lots. I&#039;m sick to death of going to tech events and being surrounded by blokes. AFAIK, the 2Web group has never turned down an application for membership from a lady. If there is passive sexism involved here, it&#039;s you girls being too passive about getting involved! Hike up your skirts girls! :-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey I, for one, am a HUGE supporter of the meme that we need more women in tech/web. Lots and lots. I&#8217;m sick to death of going to tech events and being surrounded by blokes. AFAIK, the 2Web group has never turned down an application for membership from a lady. If there is passive sexism involved here, it&#8217;s you girls being too passive about getting involved! Hike up your skirts girls! <img src='http://laurelpapworth.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
